The Danger of Hype — Why Fusion is getting a bad name.

The Thorium Network
2 min readFeb 10, 2022

--

JET UKAEA

It’s unfortunately when good science is spun to create bad press.

Fusion is no where near a solution. In the very same article Qout (thermal and not electrical) is 11 MW. Qin is 1 GW. Hence Q = 0.011.

It’s just media hype, BBC style. Europe’s ITER has collected Euro 65b of public money on the fusion lie. Well not a lie, but misinformation. To maintain funding. If politicians really new the science it would be given a few million, but that’s a digression…

From the data in the BBC/Oxford/JET article the ratio of energy out to energy in is only 1.1%, and only for 11 seconds…

Q= 0.011

Hype.

One suspects BBC/Oxford trying something similar to collect some of the billions going into UK fission projects for the JET project. There’s 300 scientists working on JET after all.

(Point to note: 14,000 people worked on the first molten salt project in 1954. It’s not because they didn’t have iPads).

The downside of hyping such projects is it delays public acceptance of fission (the same way the fossil fuel industry plays the green renewable card to the public).

Most investors are more savvy — it’s their purpose to be savvy. Eg, now Bill Gates, and of course the Turkish, Chinese, Russians and French.

Note that ITER is aiming for Q-Plasma parity. Not Q-Total… A small detail even the director of ITER opening ignores, and I am sure an ignorance he promotes. What’s his budget after all? Watch the YouTube in this article:

https://thethoriumnetwork.com/2021/10/12/fusion-is-here-today-tomorrow-maybe/

Here’s the original BBC article:

https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-60312633

#fusion #ITER #jet #fission #science

--

--

The Thorium Network
The Thorium Network

Written by The Thorium Network

We Deliver Thorium(TM) for Molten Salt Fission Technology(TM). Blockchain focused. Technology focused. A 21st century solution>>> TheThoriumNetwork.com

No responses yet